Onsor Turs

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOnsor Turs  (all builds)
MotherboardOnsor Turs-bb01-T
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2240 x 1400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 08:24
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 170
2-Core 325
103% 193 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 727
83% 650 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 29
Parallax 31.2
20% 28.4 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 21.8
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H2.16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 1419 1413 1451 1467 1451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,108
Write 1,409
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 1,433
333% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 44.2
226% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 65.2
180% 365 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 262%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 29.8
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 21.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 14" 1280 720 IVO8C45
Typical Turs Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Onsor Turs

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback