Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KD  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 00:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 45.8
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 150
52% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 304
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 10
Parallax 5.4
4% 6.67 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 0
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 512GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 497 510 652 638 585 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 598
Write 992
Mixed 335
SusWrite 566
141% 623 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 12.3
49% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 641
494% 671 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 103%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 10.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical GA-G5 KD Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback