Csl-computer 5703

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCsl-computer 5703  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 18:55
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 450
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 20.1
12% 16.4 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 12.6
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDHBA256TDV-1AY1AABFA 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4MA314
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 1228 1476 276 238 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,437
Write 1,460
Mixed 1253
SusWrite 818
331% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 63.7
212% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 871
639% 835 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 250%
Great: 250%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 119 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 118
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
Intenso Alu Line 64GB
32GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 11.8
11% 9.82 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 35.3
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 28.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5703 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Csl-computer 5703

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback