Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 09:23
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 699
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.1
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 1000 270 293 203 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,294
Write 1,507
Mixed 1,359
SusWrite 578
267% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 68.8
226% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1231
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1,025
775% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 205%
Great: 295%
Plextor PX-256M7VC 256GB
29GB free
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 245 246 229 239 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 406
Mixed 364
SusWrite 240
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 41.7
140% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 278
221% 310 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92%
Great: 103%
WDC WD20EFAX-68B2RN1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 161 163 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 184
Write 163
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 161
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 0.9
39% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28%
Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 121 119 122 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 70.2
Write 70.1
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 119
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 163 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 142
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 161
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 117 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 85.4
Write 104
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 122
58% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-027.A00G 99U5702-095.A00G 9905702-027.A00G 99U5702-095.A00G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.6
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback