HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 09:17
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 192
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 276
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 20.8
17% 15 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.7
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY29V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 121 47 55 30 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 420
Write 32.9
Mixed 232
SusWrite 103
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 11.1
92% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 14.5
60% 129 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
238GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 98 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 102
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback