Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 124
57% 91 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 341
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 99 99 96 108 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 97.3
22% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 15.4
59% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 17.8
18% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 73%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
302GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 281 279 281 281 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 294
Write 294
Mixed 222
SusWrite 276
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 22.2
77% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 169
126% 169 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-UD3R-SLI Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback