Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 138
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 420
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 17.8
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 16.4
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 105 71 64 60 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 74.9
22% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 16.1
67% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 17
18% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 73%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
301GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 264 297 242 183 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 310
Write 299
Mixed 224
SusWrite 237
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 22.6
81% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 171
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-UD3R-SLI Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback