Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 10:24
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 96.4
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 174
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 462
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 17.9
14% 18.9 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.4
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 85 114 76 58 62 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 78.4
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 16.5
69% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 18.7
19% 30 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32%
Great: 73%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
301GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 263 297 241 183 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 305
Write 298
Mixed 222
SusWrite 236
60% 265 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 22.3
77% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 171
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-UD3R-SLI Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback