Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 150
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 402
41% 333 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 18
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.3
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 85 74 71 62 66 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 70.9
22% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 16.5
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 17.8
18% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 73%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
301GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 279 295 245 182 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 309
Write 299
Mixed 221
SusWrite 238
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 22.6
79% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 172
128% 172 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-UD3R-SLI Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-UD3R-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback