HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 162 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 421 43% 346 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.53 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 4.5 4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 399 381 389 395 389 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 440 Mixed 411 SusWrite 394 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 37.5 119% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 366 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 133%
ADATA HD710 1TB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 199GB free, PID a15a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 31 Write 23 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 27.3 32% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-416.A00LF 4x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.7% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 91.2 44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	198x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	498x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16