HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 07:27
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 160 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 353 41% 318 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.5 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5 Splatting 4.4 4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 384 379 366 377 349 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 408 Write 421 Mixed 356 SusWrite 373 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 43.8 129% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 288 235% 334 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 133%
ADATA HD710 1TB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 199GB free, PID a15a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 23.4 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 27.1 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-416.A00LF 4x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.2% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 17.1 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	25%	36	37	21	60	15.5"	1920 1080	AUO13ED

History: Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 21: 2R 2G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	230x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	200x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	502x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	299x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359