Lenovo 42762QU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 42762QU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42762QU
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 110
51% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 258
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M
Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB
CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 6.06
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 7.13
6% 7.19 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 221 177 211 204 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 442
Write 402
Mixed 362
SusWrite 212
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 22.3
78% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 214
136% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 134%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 76 96 98 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 79.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 92.5
107% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-416.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 42762QU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 42762QU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback