Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 13:57
Run Duration	719 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 84.2 1-Core 168 2-Core 329 103% 194 Pts	4-Core 644 8-Core 1,245 112% 945 Pts	64-Core 2,266 140% 2,266 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Lighting 65.1 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 63.9 53% 66.9 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 55.7 51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 466GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2086 720 600 602 603 602 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	312% Outstanding	Read 2,568 Write 2,293 Mixed 1,811 SusWrite 869 421% 1,885 MB/s	4K Read 70.3 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 94.1 319% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,429 DQ Write 1,144 DQ Mixed 1,232 937% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 312% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 466GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1795 1054 791 798 760 765 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,602 Write 1850 Mixed 1,751 SusWrite 994 401% 1,799 MB/s	4K Read 71.6 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 97.4 325% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 1,424 DQ Write 1,133 DQ Mixed 1,227 932% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 346%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 13 2.8 2.7 2.7 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 508 Write 400 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 80.2 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 22.1 DQ Mixed 0.4 18% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 12TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 27GB free Firmware: D785 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 113 108 114 104 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 236 Write 222 Mixed 138 SusWrite 112 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 1.2 45% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 4.1 DQ Write 11.2 DQ Mixed 0.7 2% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 35%
Seagate Expansion Desk 14TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 66GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 26 26 27 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 260 Write 261 Mixed 202 SusWrite 26.8 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 1.5 46% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 4.6 DQ Write 17.2 DQ Mixed 2.3 4% 8.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 27GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 19 19 18 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 216 Write 210 Mixed 163 SusWrite 20 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 1.4 41% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 3.7 DQ Write 9.7 DQ Mixed 0.6 2% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 27GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 22 21 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 159 Write 165 Mixed 161 SusWrite 22.4 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 1.3 34% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 3.5 DQ Write 8.7 DQ Mixed 0.4 2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 38%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 12TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 129GB free Firmware: D785 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 49 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 105 Write 106 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 49.4 20% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 1.1 35% 9.8 MB/s	DQ Read 2 DQ Write 12.8 DQ Mixed 1.2 3% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 35%
Seagate Expansion Desk 14TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 66GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 116 116 119 118 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 238 Write 221 Mixed 140 SusWrite 117 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 1.6 46% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 4.2 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 2 4% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 15GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 88 99 98 94 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 53GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 51 50 50 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 27GB free Firmware: 9402 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 45 47 45 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 14TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 66GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 114 114 111 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 122%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 26GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 47 50 52 53 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 192 Write 193 Mixed 142 SusWrite 50.8 187% 144 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 0.8 386% 6.13 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 5.9 DQ Mixed 1.2 243% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 100%
WD Game Drive 12TB 770 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 27GB free, PID 263a Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 53 52 54 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	77% Very good	Read 245 Write 246 Mixed 170 SusWrite 53.4 229% 178 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 1.7 414% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 116%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 39GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 87 89 84 83 81 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 144 Write 110 Mixed 79 SusWrite 83 133% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 77%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00AZ6B0 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 58GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 28 30 24 27 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	Read 121 Write 115 Mixed 104 SusWrite 26 118% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 48%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 58GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 30 28 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	33% Below average	Read 138 Write 132 Mixed 109 SusWrite 28 131% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 56%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 58GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 30 28 28 27 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 143 Write 147 Mixed 114 SusWrite 27.7 140% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 56%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 66GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 50 49 52 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 217 Write 222 Mixed 198 SusWrite 50.8 225% 172 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 1.1 376% 6.8 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 9.8 DQ Mixed 1.4 384% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 107%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 66GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 99 96 98 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 203 Write 200 Mixed 200 SusWrite 99.2 234% 175 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 1.2 380% 6.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 9.6 DQ Mixed 1.8 391% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 107%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 66GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 100 102 102 92 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 216 Write 222 Mixed 185 SusWrite 98.8 239% 181 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 1.1 394% 6.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 7.6 DQ Mixed 1.7 319% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 107%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 66GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 97 98 90 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 209 Write 212 Mixed 205 SusWrite 96.7 241% 181 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 1.1 357% 6.5 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 1.4 398% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 107%
WD My Book 25ED 12TB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 27GB free, PID 25ed Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 86 91 88 87 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 182 Write 179 Mixed 135 SusWrite 88.4 192% 146 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.8 334% 4.97 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 6.6 DQ Mixed 1.4 274% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB 800 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 75.4 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 39.9 147% 51.6 GB/s	SC Read 29.2 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 36.8 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM0902 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,691x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $176Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,321x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,453x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,264x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,090x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,477x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,856x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	1,114x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	871x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	776x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	735x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $117Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	651x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,007

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359