Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 129% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 19:53
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 150 2-Core 293 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 562 8-Core 1,017 95% 789 Pts	64-Core 1,527 94% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6797) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 185 Parallax 188 142% 182 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 184 Splatting 125 120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 943 869 865 827 789 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 2,009 Write 1,418 Mixed 793 SusWrite 861 282% 1,270 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57.8 198% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 619 DQ Mixed 721 538% 717 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 353%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 164GB free Firmware: UH4400RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 139 71 153 105 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 448 Write 283 Mixed 227 SusWrite 108 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 10 62% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 74.8 DQ Mixed 21.2 36% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 145GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 419 459 469 474 472 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 476 Mixed 402 SusWrite 437 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 56.6 186% 64.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 104GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 229 232 231 228 231 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 478 Mixed 349 SusWrite 256 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 94.8 4K Mixed 52.2 176% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 333 257% 352 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 147GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,268 Write 7,617 Mixed 7,393 1,732% 7,760 MB/s	4K Read 459 4K Write 264 4K Mixed 326 1,253% 349 MB/s	DQ Read 1,046 DQ Write 687 DQ Mixed 790 610% 841 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 3TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 79 80 79 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 178 Write 134 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 78.8 149% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 74%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 1TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 816GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 79 80 79 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 77.1 Write 44.2 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 78.3 81% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 4x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 26.5 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 27.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	144	34.1"	1280 720	GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,631x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,491x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,148x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	686x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	581x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	484x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	589x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	419x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	386x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	317x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	287x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	250x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $778

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16