Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 08:15
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 897
90% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 80.4
79% 90.2 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 81.7
Splatting 73.4
61% 74 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 191 103 212 146 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 1348
Write 1,785
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 176
260% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 4.5
154% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 154
120% 169 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 114%
Great: 305%
Amd-raid T-FORCE 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: 02K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 335 326 316 303 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 387
Write 338
Mixed 300
SusWrite 322
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 9.8
30% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 82.2
85% 135 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA MQ04ABF1 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: JU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 67 68 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 118
Write 125
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 68.8
60% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 77%
Samsung Type-C 64GB
17GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 211
Write 36.2
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 24.4
86% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 4.5
386% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 113%
Linux File-Stor Gadget 125GB
76GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 4.2 6.5 6.7 5.5 5.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
Read 4.8
Write 15
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 7.8
18% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 0.4
535% 5.63 MB/s
DQ Read 8.2
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 2.1
632% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 11.6" 1280 720 HAT1160 Kamvas 12
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback