Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 08:47
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 75.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 996
95% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 79
78% 88.8 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 71.1
59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 682 114 91 65 51 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1,788
Mixed 712
SusWrite 188
228% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 5.2
67% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 207
149% 194 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 305%
Amd-raid T-FORCE 1TB
101GB free
Firmware: 02K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 323 298 291 291 280 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 459
Write 428
Mixed 390
SusWrite 301
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 7.9
30% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 79.6
84% 135 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA MQ04ABF1 1TB
98GB free
Firmware: JU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 68 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 125
Write 138
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 69.3
64% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 0" 1280 720 Kamvas 12
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $708
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback