Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 05:48
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,028
96% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 80.8
79% 90 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 73.9
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 184 160 153 98 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 1,790
Mixed 1,213
SusWrite 173
257% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 4.6
69% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 206
148% 193 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 305%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA MQ04ABF1 1TB
98GB free
Firmware: JU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 68 68 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 69.1
62% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
222% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid T-FORCE 1TB
101GB free
Firmware: 02K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 321 296 298 291 283 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
219% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 416
Mixed 374
SusWrite 305
288% 388 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 11.1
1,588% 7.63 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 26.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 0" 1280 720 Kamvas 12
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $763
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback