Lenovo 30DHS0B000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30DHS0B000  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1048
Memory7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime14 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 15:09
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 251
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 987
93% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 27.9
25% 29.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 16.8
19% 24.4 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 790 1723 1756 1765 1746 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1431
Write 1,914
Mixed 1632
SusWrite 1,474
365% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 63.4
206% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 772
497% 568 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 232%
Great: 365%
WDC PC SA530 SDATB8Y512G1001 512GB
475GB free
Firmware: 40102101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 423 450 450 448 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 461
Mixed 388
SusWrite 446
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 41.9
143% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 238
186% 254 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CVF Kingston 9905734-081.A00G 32GB
2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 27.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP311F HP V241
Typical 30DHS0B000 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 30DHS0B000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback