Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory40.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 21:17
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 93%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 249
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 663
67% 545 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 231
Parallax 176
165% 203 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 144
Splatting 128
120% 150 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 140%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDM12SI512A 512GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 461
Mixed 355
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 6.9
35% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 536
466% 694 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback