TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8597
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime27 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 798
84% 671 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 93.6%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8597) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.13 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.25%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 332 336 330 331 330 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1015
Write 336
Mixed 417
SusWrite 351
117% 530 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 40.6
161% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 410
308% 418 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 130%
 Great: 180%
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
132GB free
Firmware: R1311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 453 451 442 445 439 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 389
Mixed 215
SusWrite 445
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 30.5
108% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 152
148% 238 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 91.2%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD - [0x9E02] CMV8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 24.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 85%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 2 60 21.5" 1920 1017 ACR0467 ACER KA220HQ
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProDesk 600 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

CPU
Core i5-9500IntelBench 87%, 9,059 samples177x
Core i7-9700Intel  $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples68x
Core i3-8100Intel  $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples14x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples170x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples59x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples24x
SSD
hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GBSKBench 136%, 523 samples30x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples16x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples15x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples29x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD - [0x9E02] CMV8GX4M1A2666C18 16GBSamsungBench 75%, 18 samples16x
M378A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 67%, 3,347 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback