Aftershock GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAftershock GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15)  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard AFTERSHOCK
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 03:30
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 703
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1044) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 36.9
31% 38 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 26.4
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1044) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 5.4
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,030
Write 1,671
Mixed 945
273% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 68.5
226% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 960
726% 979 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
383GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 75.5
Write 57.9
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 85.8
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 8400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 2R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 24% 34 216 104 60 25.7" 1536 864 LHCFFFF W260U
Typical GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock GK5CN5Z (APEX - 15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback