Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 19:04
Run Duration	465 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 67.6 1-Core 145 2-Core 240 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 840 81% 669 Pts	64-Core 1,272 79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.2.3 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38% Below average	Lighting 52.4 Reflection 34.2 Parallax 59.7 43% 48.8 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 50.9 Splatting 25.6 29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 328 370 373 376 377 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 389 Mixed 393 SusWrite 361 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 41.6 136% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 185 143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 123%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 277GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 335 330 307 304 326 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 435 Write 370 Mixed 351 SusWrite 326 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 30 101% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 204 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 587GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 101 102 99 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 82.5 Write 66.1 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 99.1 55% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 794GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 101 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 23.7 Write 61.9 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 93.5 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 132GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 140 139 138 140 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 51.6 Write 94.6 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 138 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 899GB free Firmware: 0637 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 83.4 60% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
DAS TerraMaster 750GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 170GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 50 51 50 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 42.9 Write 49.2 Mixed 38 SusWrite 49.8 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 47%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 89.5 Write 87.2 Mixed 55.7 58% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 53GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 23 22 23 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 51.7 Write 21.9 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 21.7 22% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 1.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 9GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 74 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.6% Below average	Read 46.7 Write 46.5 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 73.4 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 72%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 108GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 7 Mixed 5 SusWrite 26.1 20% 16 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0 42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 74%
Toshiba 2.5"External Har 750GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 50GB free, PID 0b1f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 43.8 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 68.8 61% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 598GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 99 100 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 96.8 Write 88.1 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 97.1 104% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 44%
External USB3.0 DISK04 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 26 26 27 28 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 107 Write 101 Mixed 86 SusWrite 26.3 104% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 11.2 7% 11.2 MB/s	4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 76%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	25% Poor	Read 73.1 Write 107 Mixed 94.2 SusWrite 0 93% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 186% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 873GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 138 Write 150 Mixed 117 SusWrite 0.1 130% 101 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 168% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 80%
ST310005 20AS 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 457GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 38.4 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 39.9 50% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 19%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 641GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 98 97 97 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 99.5 Write 100 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 97 122% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 114 114 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 109 Write 114 Mixed 101 SusWrite 113 150% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.4 132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 96%
Maxtor OneTouch 750GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 18GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 20.9 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 19.5 30% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 48GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	65.8% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 26.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 23.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	100	34"	1280 720	SAM0F1D C34J79x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	508x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	489x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $700

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16