| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110831 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 06 '21 at 20:18 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | VEN-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65%
Good
|
65% 110 Pts
|
37% 275 Pts
|
17% 272 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
92.7%
Outstanding
|
95% 119 fps
|
89% 108 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 200 152 117 98 79 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
31% 137 MB/s
|
65% 21 MB/s
|
22% 27.6 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
43GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 115 113 116 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF RMR5030ME68F9F1600 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
29.9%
Poor
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
25% 8.87 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 519 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 52x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 43x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $190Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 72x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $389 |