Rackable CYPRESS11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRackable CYPRESS11  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S2600CP
Memory86.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151013
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 172
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 632
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 1,580
98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 112
Parallax 100
83% 105 fps
MRender 89.8
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 194 186 178 176 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.4% Above average
Read 250
Write 216
Mixed 235
SusWrite 184
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 28.3
92% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 186
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
185GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 386 365 347 346 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 453
Write 430
Mixed 401
SusWrite 366
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 30.6
100% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 320
238% 315 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
237GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 97 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 85.6
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 96.4
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
127GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 356 367 398 398 399 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 113
Write 32.4
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 19.4
60% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7MFR4A-PB Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB 96GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 33.2
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CYPRESS11 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Rackable CYPRESS11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 143% - Outstanding Total price: $132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback