Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 146
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 226
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
EVGA(3842 2639) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 1.4
4% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 223 251 244 269 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 605
Write 290
Mixed 392
SusWrite 241
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 8
72% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 332%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
322GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 233 258 253 275 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 454
Write 433
Mixed 394
SusWrite 250
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 45.6
136% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 283
211% 282 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 132%
WD WD10EVVS-63M5B0 1TB
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.7
Write 34.5
Mixed 27.7
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 58%
WD WD3000F9MZ-76NVPL0 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 163 166 165 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 156
Mixed 111
SusWrite 164
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%
WD WD3000F9MZ-76NVPL0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 149 154 154 156 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 159
Write 150
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 152
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 18.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 25.6" 1280 720 HWP26F7 HP LP2475w
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback