Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 163
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
EVGA(3842 2639) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 2
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 611 587 581 579 584 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 635
Write 584
Mixed 578
SusWrite 595
135% 598 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 61
186% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 581
DQ Mixed 660
494% 661 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 150%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 F3-2400C10-8GTX KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 15.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA07A DELL U2412M
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback