MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 522
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 24
Parallax 17.6
9% 17.7 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 19
Splatting 16.5
16% 20 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 307 233 147 142 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 494
Write 323
Mixed 304
SusWrite 224
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 37.8
144% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 153
149% 233 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
68GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 48 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 35.1
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 48.1
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI21D4S15HAG/8G 9905668-002.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.8
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD046F
Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback