MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 22:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 396
53% 396 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 76%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 17.6
12% 19 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 131 124 152 123 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 482
Write 322
Mixed 217
SusWrite 152
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 38.8
99% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
186GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 66.8
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 42.8
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI21D4S15HAG/8G 9905668-002.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback