MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 397
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6192
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 17.3
13% 19.4 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.5
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 167 232 104 217 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 486
Write 311
Mixed 304
SusWrite 189
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 37.5
140% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 150
155% 252 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
186GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 64
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 42.6
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI21D4S15HAG/8G 9905668-002.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback