ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star GE62 6QD
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J5 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 157 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 260 35% 261 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 115A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 20.3 12% 19.9 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 16.6 16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB 3,414 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.R SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 299 261 146 169 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 497 Write 324 Mixed 309 SusWrite 225 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 37.9 137% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 157 154% 242 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 152GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 42.8 Write 40.7 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 61.7 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI21D4S15HAG/8G 9905668-002.A00G 16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 25.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	1,168x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	328x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	88x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	943x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	507x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	91x

SSD
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	154x
MTS800 M.2 128GBTranscend $126Bench 69%, 5,326 samples	56x
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GBBench 79%, 2,005 samples	32x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	285x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	237x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	171x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback