Dell Latitude E7250

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Latitude E7250 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0TVD2T
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20200410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '21 at 15:10
Run Duration	348 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 196 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 256 35% 259 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 062D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 7.6 4% 5.47 fps	MRender 7.4 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 8.3 6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 MSATA 256GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: X354 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 250 248 209 223 214 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 418 Write 287 Mixed 186 SusWrite 234 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 30.7 116% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 203 176% 266 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 90%
SD 64GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 6GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 33 32 33 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 32.4 Mixed 34.7 SusWrite 32.2 26% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.2 628% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 45%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 16GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.7 7 6.2 5.5 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 85.9 Write 26.2 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 8.1 36% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.6 140% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 28%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 64GB 729 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 32GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.4 8.1 7.9 7.4 7.5 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 7.3 12% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2 138% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 19%
LaCie Rugged USB-C 5TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3.5TB free, PID 1093 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 120 120 121 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 47.6 Write 71 Mixed 49 SusWrite 120 104% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.4 146% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 60%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 16GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 14GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 4.8 6 5.6 5.7 6.3 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 72.4 Write 23.7 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 6.7 36% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.5 128% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Latitude E7250 Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7250

CPU
Core i5-5300UIntelBench 42%, 29,898 samples	624x
Core i7-5600UIntelBench 50%, 20,423 samples	438x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	24x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,090x
Iris Pro Graphics 5200IntelBench 4%, 1 sample	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
PM871 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 76%, 2,585 samples	184x
hynix SC210 mSATA 256GBSKBench 68%, 1,541 samples	91x
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	87x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	149x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	53x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16