Dell Latitude E7250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E7250  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0TVD2T
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 17:33
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 260
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.9
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 MSATA 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X354
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 250 228 211 223 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 388
Write 337
Mixed 214
SusWrite 232
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 29
113% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 220
186% 273 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 90%
SD 128GB
26GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 35 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 32.5
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 34.7
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.4
637% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 49%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 64GB
9GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 2.7 5.4 5.5 5.7 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 5.1
13% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 18.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7250 Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback