ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude E7250

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Latitude E7250 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0TVD2T
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20200410
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 01 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 193 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 245 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 062D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.65% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 7 4% 5.23 fps	MRender 7.5 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 8.1 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 MSATA 256GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: X354 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 239 248 223 228 230 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 327 Write 396 Mixed 260 SusWrite 243 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 31.6 121% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 227 193% 285 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 90%
SD 64GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 10GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 33 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 41.8 Write 31.9 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 32.1 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.5 657% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 45%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 16GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 14GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 6.4 6.1 6.5 6.3 6.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 14 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 6.7 23% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.6 122% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 28%
MXT-USB Storage Device 128GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 119GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.1 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.3 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 18.4 Write 16.5 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 7.2 19% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.1 208% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 20%
Mass Storage Device 128GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 4GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.6 9.5 9.7 9.8 9.6 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 17.7 Write 16.9 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 9.5 20% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.8 192% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 20%
JMicron Tech 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 13 11 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 36.4 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 11.8 39% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 64%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 16GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.7 6.2 5 4.7 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 52.2 Write 20.2 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 6.4 29% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.4 107% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 28%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 88 99 77 107 108 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 122 Write 105 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 96.6 124% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Latitude E7250 Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7250

CPU
Core i5-5300UIntelBench 42%, 29,898 samples	624x
Core i7-5600UIntelBench 50%, 20,423 samples	438x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	24x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,090x
Iris Pro Graphics 5200IntelBench 4%, 1 sample	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
PM871 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 76%, 2,585 samples	184x
hynix SC210 mSATA 256GBSKBench 68%, 1,541 samples	91x
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	87x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	149x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	53x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback