Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket BGA1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 29.7 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 64.7 24% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 150 16% 130 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 000D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 5.2 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4 Splatting 6 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 67 69 74 69 68 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.2% Average	Read 271 Write 263 Mixed 240 SusWrite 74.9 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 20.4 66% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 94.7 120% 215 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	79x
GeForce 930MNvidiaBench 8%, 4,490 samples	21x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	18x

SSD
KSG60ZMV256G 256GBToshibaBench 71%, 2,376 samples	12x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	8x
THNSNK256GVN8 256GBToshibaBench 64%, 2,371 samples	8x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	15x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	10x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	9x