Thunderobot G15X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemThunderobot G15X  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT N950TP6
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 04:42
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 728
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Clevo(1558 951B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 74
Parallax 7.3
5% 29.2 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C482101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 114 117 121 109 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,764
Write 89.1
Mixed 155
SusWrite 116
112% 531 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 16.1
108% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 507
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 234
207% 318 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 125%
Great: 209%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
327GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 71 81 74 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 329
Write 102
Mixed 333
SusWrite 123
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 29.7
116% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 190
169% 253 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 102%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 125GB
72GB free, PID 0809
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 0 7.2 0 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.2
Write 34.4
SusWrite 6.1
28% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 8603 SP008GBSFU240B02 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 109 5 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO60ED
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback