TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Thunderobot G15X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemThunderobot G15X  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT N950TP6
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 03:54
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 649
72% 568 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 87.6%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Clevo(1558 951B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 7.2
5% 28.9 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.83%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C482101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,912
Write 795
Mixed 947
267% 1,218 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68.8
229% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 180
210% 379 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 209%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
327GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 218
Write 239
Mixed 348
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 26.4
108% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 130
139% 229 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 125GB
47GB free, PID 0809
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.8
Write 35.6
Mixed 28.6
41% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 8603 SP008GBSFU240B02 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 77.7%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 4 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO60ED
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback