Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '21 at 22:39
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 82.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 292 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 581 8-Core 822 88% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,082 67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1161) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.2% Good	Lighting 91.3 Reflection 85.3 Parallax 74.1 74% 83.6 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 75 Splatting 68 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 1097 1035 1030 1025 1001 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	298% Outstanding	Read 2,556 Write 2,364 Mixed 1,602 SusWrite 1,069 424% 1,898 MB/s	4K Read 65 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 90.5 304% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 942 DQ Write 667 DQ Mixed 717 559% 775 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 298% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 548GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 493 493 495 494 490 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 494 Mixed 444 SusWrite 493 110% 487 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 65.2 218% 76.4 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 278 224% 311 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$112 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 128 135 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 118 Write 105 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 131 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 118 122 114 112 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 112 Write 102 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 116 70% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 26% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 95 104 103 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 78.1 Write 111 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 100 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 164% 2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 125 126 126 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70% Very good	Read 121 Write 116 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 124 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,684 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 38.2 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 37.6 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	30	84.6"	1280 720	SAM0F09 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,632x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,232x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	859x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	826x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	705x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	625x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16