Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 87.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 294 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 840 89% 710 Pts	64-Core 1084 67% 1084 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1161) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.3% Good	Lighting 91.6 Reflection 85.6 Parallax 74.7 75% 84 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 67.9 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1395 1184 1182 1198 1102 1030 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,551 Write 2,379 Mixed 1,681 SusWrite 1,182 436% 1,948 MB/s	4K Read 66.7 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 92.3 308% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,210 DQ Write 840 DQ Mixed 970 739% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 548GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 491 486 491 491 494 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 494 Mixed 460 SusWrite 491 111% 491 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 65.8 219% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 122 123 124 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 122 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 114 114 118 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 97.2 Write 98.6 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 115 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 104 103 112 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 62.1 Write 91.1 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 105 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.4 155% 2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 125 118 127 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 123 Write 118 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 123 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,684 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	95.3% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 37.8 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 37.2 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	7	30	84.6"	1280 720	SAM0F09 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,621x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,227x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	854x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	820x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	700x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	622x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	304x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	374x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16