Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84DB
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201102
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 248 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 756 73% 602 Pts	64-Core 972 60% 972 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000 809 User benchmarks, average bench 166% Nvidia(10DE 147E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2400 MHz, MLim: 4200 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Lighting 244 Reflection 250 Parallax 287 199% 260 fps
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 172%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 1228 1199 1223 1180 1157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 1,800 Write 1,811 Mixed 1,234 SusWrite 1,158 337% 1501 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 68.7 229% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,026 DQ Write 663 DQ Mixed 795 606% 828 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 32GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 447 447 450 442 428 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 430 Mixed 408 SusWrite 432 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 43.8 141% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 316 238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB 2,443 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 455GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 310 292 313 328 333 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 276 Write 326 Mixed 273 SusWrite 317 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 23.7 76% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 126 92% 119 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 20,439 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 27.5 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 27.1 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,802x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	949x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1,171x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,144x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	526x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	336x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	234x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmv128gBench 91%, 3,266 samples	216x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	316x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	304x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	266x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16