HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DB
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201102
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 19:27
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 766
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000
Nvidia(10DE 147E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 230
Parallax 271
186% 243 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 191
Splatting 180
170% 213 fps
Poor: 154%
This bench: 165%
Great: 172%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1205 1266 1212 1218 1180 1146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,858
Write 1,778
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 1,204
345% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 68.7
220% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 654
DQ Mixed 793
604% 826 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 254%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
32GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 444 444 441 408 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 419
Mixed 420
SusWrite 399
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 42.9
141% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 315
237% 318 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
455GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 317 317 314 314 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 292
Write 319
Mixed 283
SusWrite 318
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 24
78% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 125
91% 118 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 27.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 6R 8G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 14% 129 281 184 60 43" 1280 720 SNY7E04 SONY TV *00
History: Score 49: 6R 6G 1B | Score 39: 3R 8G 0B | Score 58: 6R 8G 4B
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback