Maxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardMaxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 66.5
37% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 103
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 21.4
14% 21.9 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 25.3
19% 22.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.M0300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 83 94 88 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 27
Write 51.1
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 87.2
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-A10 4600 Quad Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback