Maxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardMaxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170918
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 12:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 82.5
45% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 109
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 21.4
13% 21.8 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 19.9
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.M0300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 47 44 31 44 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 27.4
Write 47.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 42.7
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 1TB
104GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 27.3
Mixed 25
SusWrite 27.5
37% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 8.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-A10 4600 Quad Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback