Maxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardMaxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170918
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 82.9
44% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 128
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 21.5
14% 22 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 25.3
19% 22.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.M0300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 85 84 83 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 80.5
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 7% 44 91 5 60 18.5" 1366 768 GSM5ACB LG HD
History:
Typical MS-A10 4600 Quad Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-A10 4600 Quad

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback