Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory121.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 03:59
Run Duration443 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,233
110% 928 Pts
64-Core 2,824
175% 2,824 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 312
Parallax 362
270% 335 fps
MRender 369
Gravity 269
Splatting 198
219% 279 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 223%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 412 371 370 371 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 456
Mixed 444
SusWrite 392
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 61.2
201% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 117%
Great: 130%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
423GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3406 3420 3409 2078 1243 1236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
445% Outstanding
Read 2,858
Write 2,715
Mixed 3,109
SusWrite 2,465
629% 2,787 MB/s
4K Read 84.8
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 120
392% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 1,218
DQ Mixed 1,299
976% 1,304 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 445%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
645GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3341 3347 3347 2406 1582 1571 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
453% Outstanding
Read 2,975
Write 2,892
Mixed 3,061
SusWrite 2,599
650% 2,882 MB/s
4K Read 82
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 114
371% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,417
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 1,337
1,004% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 453%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
453GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3303 3309 3037 760 759 760 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
414% Outstanding
Read 2,950
Write 3,155
Mixed 2991
SusWrite 1,988
624% 2,771 MB/s
4K Read 82.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 112
369% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,421
DQ Write 1,274
DQ Mixed 1,332
1,003% 1,343 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 414%
Great: 442%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 203 204 203 204 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
202% Outstanding
MC Read 163
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 41.5
232% 81.3 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 40
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 202%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 21% 33 110 7 60 28.6" 2560 1440 SAM1015 LU28R55
History: Score 31: 4R 2G 5B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback