Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 265%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics221% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory122.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 05:56
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,178
105% 889 Pts
64-Core 2,897
179% 2,897 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Lighting 328
Reflection 312
Parallax 339
267% 326 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 270
Splatting 199
220% 280 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 221%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 455 458 436 370 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 457
Mixed 445
SusWrite 424
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 60.9
201% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 119%
Great: 130%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
423GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3410 3420 3420 1917 1234 1237 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
447% Outstanding
Read 3,002
Write 3,411
Mixed 3,110
SusWrite 2,440
675% 2,991 MB/s
4K Read 84.7
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 119
390% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,338
DQ Write 1,181
DQ Mixed 1,254
942% 1,258 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 447%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
645GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3344 3351 3351 2373 1575 1564 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
450% Outstanding
Read 2,979
Write 3,344
Mixed 3,062
SusWrite 2,593
676% 2,994 MB/s
4K Read 81.9
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 113
368% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 1,285
967% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 450%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
453GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3314 3316 3014 755 758 755 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
412% Outstanding
Read 2,965
Write 3268
Mixed 2,971
SusWrite 1,985
630% 2,797 MB/s
4K Read 81.7
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 113
367% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1358
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 1,293
971% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 412%
Great: 442%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 199
Mixed 86
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
859% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 215
Write 28.5
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 26.7
78% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 12
909% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 21.8
DQ Mixed 13.6
1,268% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 140
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 42
211% 73.9 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.8
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 185%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback