Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 287%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics238% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory122.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 09:34
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 307
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,167
104% 882 Pts
64-Core 2,877
178% 2,877 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4982 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Lighting 360
Reflection 332
Parallax 365
293% 352 fps
MRender 389
Gravity 289
Splatting 204
230% 294 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 238%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 392 371 371 370 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 457
Mixed 444
SusWrite 390
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 62.6
206% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
163% 218 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 118%
Great: 130%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
423GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3410 3417 3415 1966 1242 1234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
446% Outstanding
Read 2,927
Write 3,406
Mixed 3,122
SusWrite 2,447
672% 2,976 MB/s
4K Read 85
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 120
393% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,184
DQ Mixed 1261
948% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 446%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
645GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3347 3349 3349 2408 1567 1569 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 2,980
Write 3,053
Mixed 3,069
SusWrite 2598
660% 2,925 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 114
372% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 1,303
978% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 452%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
453GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3308 3315 3041 758 761 760 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 2,994
Write 3,312
Mixed 2,993
SusWrite 1,990
636% 2,823 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 113
370% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,377
DQ Write 1,231
DQ Mixed 1,301
976% 1,303 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 415%
Great: 442%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 202 202 203 203 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 214
Write 26.6
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 26.8
91% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 8.4
787% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 13.7
1,287% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
193% Outstanding
MC Read 150
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 41.5
220% 77 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 40.6
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 193%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback