Alienware m15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware m15  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0WCNK6
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 09:40
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 206
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 432
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 08A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9563
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 7.6
5% 28.6 fps
Gravity 7
Splatting 9.8
8% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 988 859 839 833 791 851 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 2,025
Mixed 1,788
SusWrite 860
397% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 64.9
219% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 421
280% 341 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 232%
Great: 340%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
258GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 1855 2103 1688 478 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,705
Write 1,389
Mixed 1,658
SusWrite 1,413
347% 1,541 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 58
187% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 52.7
184% 405 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 239%
Great: 332%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
801GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 119 124 119 118 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 40.9
Write 72.8
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 110
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.1% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 23.7
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 18.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m15 Builds (Compare 657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback