Alienware m15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware m15  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0WCNK6
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 09:29
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 646
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 08A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9563
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 7.9
5% 28.9 fps
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1050 856 854 853 845 844 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,523
Write 2,201
Mixed 1,809
SusWrite 884
414% 1,854 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 71.6
230% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 356
320% 480 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 251%
Great: 340%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
258GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2049 2062 999 470 471 470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 2072
Mixed 1,684
SusWrite 1,087
366% 1,624 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 60
197% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 454
373% 524 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 219%
Great: 332%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
801GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 56 57 104 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 37.8
Write 77.4
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 74.9
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m15 Builds (Compare 657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback