Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 313
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,169
107% 897 Pts
64-Core 2,368
147% 2,368 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Asus(1043 04D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1700 MHz, MLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 111
Reflection 117
Parallax 189
90% 139 fps
Gravity 124
Splatting 80.9
88% 102 fps
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 21.8
13% 18.4 fps
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 16
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 169 541 617 342 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 966
Write 451
Mixed 456
SusWrite 367
124% 560 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 47.7
225% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 389
329% 487 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 152%
Great: 147%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
44GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 141 148 273 143 152 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 274
Write 97.1
Mixed 140
SusWrite 188
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 19.5
81% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 28.8
22% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
730GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 115 115 115 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 107
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 113
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
246% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
199GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 137 136 134 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 180
Write 153
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 130
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 186 188 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 179
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 187
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 32GB
3333, 3333, 3333, 3333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 41.3
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 37.5
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $809
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback