Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1253
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 2,264
140% 2,264 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Asus(1043 04D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1680 MHz, MLim: 1018 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 197
90% 141 fps
Gravity 131
Splatting 80.1
90% 106 fps
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 21.6
13% 18.4 fps
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 16.1
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 582 838 402 237 358 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 403
Mixed 430
SusWrite 422
122% 551 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 69.7
206% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 222
215% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 148%
Great: 147%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
44GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 150 145 206 202 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 300
Write 108
Mixed 149
SusWrite 187
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 19.4
80% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 29.1
22% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
730GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 119 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 42.4
Write 28
Mixed 48
SusWrite 122
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
150GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 165 169 170 168 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 94
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 166
81% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 188 187 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 181
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 186
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 32GB
3333, 3333, 3333, 3333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 40.9
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 33.9
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback